Selection

Select here what should be displayed in the chart and in the table.

Download Headline CSV Download Source CSV

Data source: Federal Statistical Office

Geographical Area: Germany

This table includes additional information to the above visualized indicators, i.e. a short definition of this indicator and a description of the politically determined target values as well as explaining the political intention behind selecting this indicator.

Definition (Text from the Indicator Report 2022 - State 31.10.2022)

The indicator shows the proportion of foreign school graduates as a percentage of all foreign school leavers within a school year. In this case, the term “graduates” refers to people who leave general education schools with at least a secondary general school certificate.

Definition

The indicator shows the proportion of foreign school leavers among all foreign school leavers in a year group (in per cent). School leavers are those who leave general education schools with at least a lower secondary school leaving certificate, while school leavers are those who leave school without a school leaving certificate.

Intention

The integration of foreigners living in Germany is an important prerequisite for the social cohesion of our society. The basic prerequisite for successful integration is sufficient school qualifications that open up vocational training and employment opportunities.

Target

Increase the proportion of foreign school leavers with at least a secondary general school certificate and bring into line with that of German school leavers by 2030

Type of target

Combination of target direction and goal with concrete target value

Implemen­tation in weather symbol calculation

Indicator 10.1 has two targets to be fulfilled at the same time: The proportion of foreign school leavers among all foreign school leavers should increase. At the same time, the difference to the corresponding proportion of German school leavers should be reduced to a maximum of 0 percentage points by 2030.


The first sub-goal would be rated as “slightly cloudy”, as although the most recent trend in 2023 points in the desired direction, the average trend from 2018 to 2023 points in the opposite direction. The second sub-goal would be rated as “Cloud”, as although the trend points in the desired direction, it would fall well short of the politically defined target of 0 percentage points in 2030 if the current trend were to continue.


In the case of indicators with several targets to be met at the same time, it is envisaged that the worst assessment of each sub-target will be used for the overall assessment of the indicator. Accordingly, indicator 10.1 for the year 2023 is rated as “Cloud”.

Assessment

Weathersymbol: cloud

Data state

05.11.2024

10.1 Foreign school graduates

This indicator represents the proportion of foreign school graduates relative to the total number of foreign school leavers and graduates within a given cohort.

Graduates are defined as pupils who have completed a specific type of school with a formal qualification. This also includes those who transfer to another general education school type to obtain an additional qualification.

Foreign nationals are defined as all persons who are not German within the meaning of Article 116 (1) of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz, GG), that is, those who do not hold German citizenship. This definition also encompasses stateless persons and those with unresolved citizenship status. Persons holding German citizenship alongside another nationality are not classified as part of the foreign population.

In 2023, the proportion of foreign school graduates among all foreign school leavers and graduates stood at 82.3%. This represents the third consecutive year of decline compared to the previous year.

A gender-specific analysis reveals that the proportion of female foreign graduates among all female foreign school leavers and graduates was 85.2%, whereas the corresponding figure for males was 79.7%.

The proportion of German school graduates among all German school leavers and graduates was most recently 94.2%, remaining very stable over the past fifteen years. The difference between the proportion of foreign and German graduates reached its lowest point of 6.1 percentage points in 2013. However, following increased migration of refugees in 2015/2016, this gap widened significantly again, surpassing the level observed in 1996 (11.8 percentage points).

The largest gap recorded was in 2017, at 13.0 percentage points. After a temporary reduction to 9.6 percentage points in 2020, the gap stood again at 11.9 percentage points in 2023.

The politically established target to increase the proportion of foreign school graduates with at least a First School Leaving Certificate was not met in 2023, nor was the goal of aligning this proportion with the level of German school graduates.

When considering not only absolute proportions but also the level of attainment, it is evident that among foreign graduates of general education schools in the 2023 cohort, 30.9% obtained the First School Leaving Certificate, 39.0% left school with an Intermediate School Leaving Certificate (Mittlerer Abschluss), and 12.3% achieved the entrance qualification for universities of applied sciences (Fachhochschulreife) or the general higher education entrance qualification (Allgemeine Hochschulreife).

Among German school graduates, the corresponding proportions were 14.9% for the First School Leaving Certificate, 43.5% for the Intermediate School Leaving Certificate, and 35.9% for the Fachhochschulreife or Allgemeine Hochschulreife.

Notably, foreign youths are markedly underrepresented compared to their German peers, especially in higher educational qualifications.

The data underlying this indicator derive from school statistics compiled by the Federal Statistical Office from the individual federal states’ records. These generally consist of complete surveys with a mandatory reporting obligation.

The aggregation of federal state results into a national figure is influenced by differences in education policy among the federal states – for example, with respect to promotion regulations or the structuring of vocational education pathways. Such differences can only be partially compensated for by formal regulations aimed at standardising classifications.